Skip to content
home » Entertainment » Zhuo Wei’s baseless gossip about Pushu is misleadingly deceptive

Zhuo Wei’s baseless gossip about Pushu is misleadingly deceptive

In August 24, three vague celebrity gossip topics hit hot searches without evidence, misleading netizens to target irrelevant stars, reminding people to甄别信息 before believing.

In the early hours of August 24, three topics related to celebrities suddenly shot to the top of the trending list.What made this incident particularly peculiar was that no related video footage had been leaked, nor were there any audio clips to corroborate the claims. Entertainment reporter Zhuo Wei merely posted a few sets of letters on social media, yet the information pieced together from them covered a wide range of sensational plotlines—such as marital infidelity, domestic violence, and dispute mediation—that are of greatest interest to gossip-hungry audiences.Netizens independently cross-referenced the letters to speculate on the individuals involved, and in less than half a day, topics related to Pu Shu, Zhou Xun, and Wu Xiaomin had topped the trending list—an incident that inevitably caused concern among their fans.

Zhuo Wei Reveals He Has No Concrete Evidence Against Pu Shu


At the time, most people did not wait for a response from the individuals involved, nor did they verify the accuracy of the information; they simply pieced together scattered, half-true, half-false fragments of old news that had surfaced in the past and treated them as established facts. As a result, a flood of malicious comments, completely without basis, was directed at three celebrities who had no connection to the matter.

Zhuo Wei, China's No. 1 Paparazzo

In his
early years, Zhuo Wei gained a massive following through a series of well-documented exposés, earning him the nickname “King of Hard Evidence” among the public. Now, however, he makes claims based solely on vague statements, and the credibility he built up over many years has been completely eroded.This latest round of unsubstantiated “letter-based” revelations is essentially just a routine ploy to drive traffic by changing the format—nothing new. Once you sort out the full story, you can rest easy.
I wonder if most people, when they come across such trending topics, have ever subconsciously believed these unsourced rumors or participated in such baseless discussions. The
next time you encounter this kind of gossip with unclear origins, it might be worth taking a moment to evaluate it before forming an opinion.